Is Humanism Arrogant?
TMurray printable version print page     Bookmark and Share
Tue Apr 14, 2009 at 06:53:39 AM EST
Much to the dismay of theocratic Christians, humanists claim that ethics can be understood without resorting to the supernatural or alleged divine authority from religious texts.  Christian theocrats say this is hubris.
Many allegedly "humble" Christians claim that anyone who does not believe that God's wisdom is superior to man's is "arrogant". This inverts the actual situation! Anyone who says that God is all wise must mean either (A) that God is wise because anything God does is wise, or (B) that God is wise because God does wise things. If we accept (A) then anything would be wise simply by virtue of the fact that God does it. So, if God arbitrarily tortures human infants, this is wise. If God says 2 + 2 = 3, this would have to be wise too, since God said it. On the other hand, if God is wise because God does wise things (as in B) then this implies that there is some standard by which we can judge which things are wise, and that this standard is independent of God. It is precisely because God conforms to this independent standard that we can congratulate Him on his wisdom. But then God is redundant, since we already know what is wise anyway, and He just happens to get it right.  

In conclusion, one would have to know at least as much as God, if not more, in order to pay Him this "compliment" on His wisdom.  



To discuss this story, sign up for a free account

Display:
Is Humanism Arrogant? | 8 comments (8 topical, 0 hidden)
Hmmm.... (none / 0)
I would ask them:  "Who is more arrogant- someone who quietly helps a disabled person try to function in spite of their physical limitations, or someone who thinks that they can dictate the life of that same disabled person- including (wrongly) judging that the disability is not real?"

That has been my experience- and the more theocratic, the more likely they will fit my experience.  Those "Christians" think they have God's Own Command to pass (false) judgment on others and to tell people they "Know God's plan for your life!!" (said plan turns out to be injustice, misery, and suffering) - and let me tell you- 99.99% of them won't lift a finger to help someone get around a problem- THEY CONDEMN THE PERSON FOR HAVING THE PROBLEM IN THE FIRST PLACE.

(Have you ever heard them say: "If you hadn't ___ [fill in the blank with been drinking, used drugs, spent money on something, SINNED, you name it], you wouldn't be in this situation in the first place!"?  Never mind said situation might have been caused by someone else doing what they shouldn't have and harming the first person.  I've known people whose health and life were ruined by a drunk driver- yet they also got this cr**!  I also have met people who were homeless and got this in their face!)

Atheists, humanists, and liberals on the other hand (in my experience), instead of giving someone a handout that has many hidden strings attached (including condemnation for being in a hard place)- they LISTEN, they quietly try to help, and they CARE.  For the most part, this has been true of about 95% of the atheists/humanists/liberals I've met.

I would then ask them who is more Christ-like and who is more arrogant.

Oh... and this is the corker.  Morality and ethics are culturally defined.  Their so-called "God's standards" are what their culture has taught them.  That is why those "Christians" are also so judgmental towards other cultures.  They confuse their culture with God.

by ArchaeoBob on Tue Apr 14, 2009 at 10:56:45 AM EST

I with you on this one. (none / 0)
Just look to that hideously funny TV ad decrying same-sex marriage. One of the last lines is how these people come together "in love" while they fight tooth and nail to oppress a minority. I'd be left scratching my head on that one if it wasn't just par for the course with the religious right. Moderate Christians and atheists alike should be up in arms in protest to the religious right's usurpation of the faith. I can't think of anything I'd have to complain about re: Christianity, if it wasn't tied to the hip with the radicals who have taken over the conversation for the religious side. Were I a Christian, I'd be plenty pissed about that.

by trog69 on Fri Apr 17, 2009 at 11:46:47 PM EST
Parent
I am pissed to the point (none / 0)
that it is affecting my enjoyment of life. The woman known as the big Christian where I work volunteered to serve ice cream at the poorest school in the city. These children won this for some academic achievement (of the whole class). All of the children were African American or Hispanic. When we got back the "church lady" told me she wasn't going there anymore because "they just don't appreciate anything". Gee, how does a 6 year old child show appreciation for the free ice cream (we did not pay for it) that they got when she handed them a bowl. And they are so poor that ice cream is a great reward. Honestly, evangelicals are just giving Christ a bad name. I now say... I'm a Christian.... Presbyterian... USA... we have gay people in our church... our published position on abortion is that it is an intensely personal decision and the woman, if she asks, deserves our support and help as she decides....  our pastor went to Harvard. That about does it I think.

by stcrispian on Mon Jul 20, 2009 at 09:10:20 PM EST
Parent



Evangelical Ethics (none / 0)
Are you suggesting that only one of the options in Euthyphro's dilemma represents the ethical theory of "theocrats?" And how do humanists "understand" ethics?

by SarahFlashing on Fri May 01, 2009 at 02:33:09 PM EST
To answer your questions (none / 0)
I am suggesting that the theocrats have to answer the dilemma, and a dilemma presents two options, both of which are undesirable/have undesirable consequences for their position.  

Humanists understand (why the scare quotes?) ethics as derived from human beings, or from facts about human nature.  That is not to automatically commit the naturalistic fallacy.  One can understand that facts ought to be RELEVANT to ethics without seeing them as IDENTICAL to ethics or as dictating what we make of those facts. Ethics will always be a value judgement about what is important, or most important for human beings, ... or for being 'human'. The problem with theocrats is that they tend to abdicate all responsibility and pretend that they themselves are not making any such judgments about emphasis.    

by TMurray on Mon May 25, 2009 at 04:09:12 AM EST
Parent



It isn't the god, it is the people who make it (none / 0)
Too many Christians seem to forget the parable of their creation and how Adam and Eve got their bare butts booted from their Eden. Eating the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good & evil (one of the attributes of JHVH) settled that for us. The other tree was of immortality. (Something we could create for ourselves in the future.) So It must be the arrogance of people making godly decisions for their own lives that is inherently both insulting and egotistical to the Christian who abdicates that sin. "Playing god" is something we do every time we don't pray for knowledge for a decision in our lives. If we could all be humanists first we could do many good things to and for each other. No religion need be involved but is okay as long as it helps another. But then we run the risk of us being 'helped' by those who would do us harm like the Inquisition who believed the soul was more important than the corruptible body.

by Nightgaunt on Tue May 19, 2009 at 01:42:19 PM EST
The status of the 'soul' ... (none / 0)
Thanks for your comments.  I agree with you.  I think, though, that the Inquisition represented not a preference for the 'soul' over the body, but a view of human nature as corrupted or dominated by the sinful flesh, in such a way that extrinsic authority was necessary.  Theocrats have always been repelled by the idea that the soul might be able to overpower the flesh and control it - because this would mean that human individuals have self-control and free will, and consequently can be trusted with self-determination.  What started with St. Paul and continued with Augustine was a deterministic picture of human nature controlled by carnal nature, such that the only hope for human goodness must lie in external authorities.  This way, human salvation could be achieved only by OBEDIENCE to these extrinsic sources of "goodness".  If you allow that human individuals  are capable of autonomy, you create democratic forms of government.  Conservatism and authoritarianism rest of a low estimation of human nature and on the belief that humans do not possess genuine free will.  

by TMurray on Mon May 25, 2009 at 04:20:11 AM EST
Parent


I'd have to ask... compared to what? (none / 0)
We have a United States Senator, who talked his finely educated and accomplished wife, into dropping everything, submitting to his every will, bearing four children (who have to listen, endlessly to his talk of his mistress) who look to the same sex parent for the most guidance, and have to live in public with his creepy goings on. Then we find that he visits the C Street House in Washington, where men go to be told they are God, and therefore above any moral code or law. I would have to say God created arrogance and for some reason decided to leave it with the Governor of South Carolina.

by stcrispian on Mon Jul 20, 2009 at 08:51:16 PM EST

Is Humanism Arrogant? | 8 comments (8 topical, 0 hidden)

WWW Talk To Action


Cognitive Dissonance & Dominionism Denial
There is new research on why people are averse to hearing or learning about the views of ideological opponents. Based on evaluation of five......
By Frederick Clarkson (375 comments)
Will the Air Force Do Anything To Rein In Its Dynamic Duo of Gay-Bashing, Misogynistic Bloggers?
"I always get nervous when I see female pastors/chaplains. Here is why everyone should as well: "First, women are not called to be pastors,......
By Chris Rodda (203 comments)
The Legacy of Big Oil
The media is ablaze with the upcoming publication of David Grann's book, Killers of the Flower Moon. The shocking non fiction account of the......
By wilkyjr (111 comments)
Gimme That Old Time Dominionism Denial
Over the years, I have written a great deal here and in other venues about the explicitly theocratic movement called dominionism -- which has......
By Frederick Clarkson (101 comments)
History Advisor to Members of Congress Completely Twists Jefferson's Words to Support Muslim Ban
Pseudo-historian David Barton, best known for his misquoting of our country's founders to promote the notion that America was founded as a Christian nation,......
By Chris Rodda (113 comments)
"Christian Fighter Pilot" Calls First Lesbian Air Force Academy Commandant a Liar
In a new post on his "Christian Fighter Pilot" blog titled "BGen Kristin Goodwin and the USAFA Honor Code," Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan......
By Chris Rodda (144 comments)
Catholic Right Leader Unapologetic about Call for 'Death to Liberal Professors' -- UPDATED
Today, Donald Trump appointed C-FAM Executive Vice President Lisa Correnti to the US Delegation To UN Commission On Status Of Women. (C-FAM is a......
By Frederick Clarkson (126 comments)
Controlling Information
     Yesterday I listened to Russ Limbaugh.  Rush advised listeners it would be best that they not listen to CNN,MSNBC, ABC, CBS and......
By wilkyjr (118 comments)
Is Bannon Fifth-Columning the Pope?
In December 2016 I wrote about how White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, who likes to flash his Catholic credentials when it comes to......
By Frank Cocozzelli (251 comments)
Ross Douthat's Hackery on the Seemingly Incongruous Alliance of Bannon & Burke
Conservative Catholic writer Ross Douthat has dissembled again. This time, in a February 15, 2017 New York Times op-ed titled The Trump Era's Catholic......
By Frank Cocozzelli (65 comments)
`So-Called Patriots' Attack The Rule Of Law
Every so often, right-wing commentator Pat Buchanan lurches out of the far-right fever swamp where he has resided for the past 50 years to......
By Rob Boston (161 comments)
Bad Faith from Focus on the Family
Here is one from the archives, Feb 12, 2011, that serves as a reminder of how deeply disingenuous people can be. Appeals to seek......
By Frederick Clarkson (177 comments)
The Legacy of George Wallace
"One need not accept any of those views to agree that they had appealed to real concerns of real people, not to mindless, unreasoning......
By wilkyjr (70 comments)
Betsy DeVos's Mudsill View of Public Education
My Talk to Action colleague Rachel Tabachnick has been doing yeoman's work in explaining Betsy DeVos's long-term strategy for decimating universal public education. If......
By Frank Cocozzelli (80 comments)
Prince and DeVos Families at Intersection of Radical Free Market Privatizers and Religious Right
This post from 2011 surfaces important information about President-Elect Trump's nominee for Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos. -- FC Erik Prince, Brother of Betsy......
By Rachel Tabachnick (218 comments)

Respect for Others? or Political Correctness?
The term "political correctness" as used by Conservatives and Republicans has often puzzled me: what exactly do they mean by it? After reading Chip Berlin's piece here-- http://www.talk2action.org/story/2016/7/21/04356/9417 I thought about what he explained......
MTOLincoln (253 comments)
Fear
What I'm feeling now is fear.  I swear that it seems my nightmares are coming true with this new "president".  I'm also frustrated because so many people are not connecting all the dots! I've......
ArchaeoBob (109 comments)
"America - love it or LEAVE!"
I've been hearing that and similar sentiments fairly frequently in the last few days - far FAR more often than ever before.  Hearing about "consequences for burning the flag (actions) from Trump is chilling!......
ArchaeoBob (216 comments)
"Faked!" Meme
Keep your eyes and ears open for a possible move to try to discredit the people openly opposing Trump and the bigots, especially people who have experienced terrorism from the "Right"  (Christian Terrorism is......
ArchaeoBob (166 comments)
More aggressive proselytizing
My wife told me today of an experience she had this last week, where she was proselytized by a McDonald's employee while in the store. ......
ArchaeoBob (164 comments)
See if you recognize names on this list
This comes from the local newspaper, which was conservative before and took a hard right turn after it was sold. Hint: Sarah Palin's name is on it!  (It's also connected to Trump.) ......
ArchaeoBob (169 comments)
Unions: A Labor Day Discussion
This is a revision of an article which I posted on my personal board and also on Dailykos. I had an interesting discussion on a discussion board concerning Unions. I tried to piece it......
Xulon (180 comments)
Extremely obnoxious protesters at WitchsFest NYC: connected to NAR?
In July of this year, some extremely loud, obnoxious Christian-identified protesters showed up at WitchsFest, an annual Pagan street fair here in NYC.  Here's an account of the protest by Pagan writer Heather Greene......
Diane Vera (130 comments)
Capitalism and the Attack on the Imago Dei
I joined this site today, having been linked here by Crooksandliars' Blog Roundup. I thought I'd put up something I put up previously on my Wordpress blog and also at the DailyKos. As will......
Xulon (331 comments)
History of attitudes towards poverty and the churches.
Jesus is said to have stated that "The Poor will always be with you" and some Christians have used that to refuse to try to help the poor, because "they will always be with......
ArchaeoBob (149 comments)
Alternate economy medical treatment
Dogemperor wrote several times about the alternate economy structure that dominionists have built.  Well, it's actually made the news.  Pretty good article, although it doesn't get into how bad people could be (have been)......
ArchaeoBob (90 comments)
Evidence violence is more common than believed
Think I've been making things up about experiencing Christian Terrorism or exaggerating, or that it was an isolated incident?  I suggest you read this article (linked below in body), which is about our great......
ArchaeoBob (214 comments)

More Diaries...




All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors. Everything else © 2005 Talk to Action, LLC.