|
Will MA Legislators Allow the Religious Right to Try to Make the Bay State the Anti-Gay State?
At the HQ of James Dobson's Focus on the Family in Colorado Springs, Colorado -- all eyes are focused on the Massachusetts Statehouse on Beacon Hill. FOF "Citzen Link" news reports calls for "God's intervention," turning to quotes and analysis from FOF Action's state issues analyst; a spokesperson for the Massachusetts Family Institute, (MFI, a state political affiliate of FOF); and a spokesperson for VoteonMarriage, the coalition spearheaded by MFI and can be found on the MFI web site.
"The opposition has decided to use their considerable power and influence to see that the marriage amendment is defeated," said Mona Passignano, state issues analyst for Focus on the Family Action. "And the people of Massachusetts who want the opportunity to vote on marriage need our help -- and they desperately need God's intervention.
This could be the shape of things to come if opponents of marriage equality succeed in getting the necessary 50 votes to send a referendum to the voters to amend the state constitution in 2008. There may be a vote on Thursday, June 14th. If cooler heads are unable to peel away enough votes from the anti-gay hot heads -- the vote may be postponed by legislative leaders. But if the referendum does, finally go to the voters, the national religious right will pour money and organizers into the state, pitting the citizens of Massachusetts against themselves, the way that they have done in other states -- and the way that religious right "renewal groups" have done in the mainline Protestant churches. |
The religious right needs only a quarter of the legislature -- 50 votes -- for the referendum to move onto the ballot in November 2008. As of now, there appear to be 57 votes Democratic Governor Deval Patrick who was elected as an unequivocally pro-marriage equality candidate last year, is lobbying legislators heavily, and notes that if the initiative makes the ballot, it will be a major distraction from the work of the state.
Peter Dolan, statewide chair of Progressive Democrats of Massachusetts reminds us There is a high probability that on Thursday the legislature will vote on whether the proposed constitutional amendment that would eliminate marriage equality should appear on the November 2008 election ballot.
Mass Equality (one of our partner organization in Mass Alliance) has a tool on their website that allows you to find (State Rep & Senator] contact information if you don't already know it:
If you have already done this, or still have some time to devote to this issue, take a few minutes to review these maps on the Mass Equality website ... and contact people you know in districts where the legislator has not confirmed opposition to this proposed amendment to our state constitution. Ask your friends and family members in those districts to call their legislators.
Let's do what can now to preserve this right for same-sex couples, and avoid a costly and needlessly divisive ballot campaign over the next year and a half.
Earlier this year, Gov. Patrick said:
"Above all, this is a question of conscience. Using the initiative process to give a minority fewer freedoms than the majority, and to inject the state into fundamentally private affairs, is a dangerous precedent, and an unworthy one for this Commonwealth. Never in the long history of our model Constitution have we used the initiative petition to restrict freedom. We ought not start now.
"For practical reasons as well, its time to move on. Whatever ones views of marriage equality, all can agree that we have far more pressing issues before the Legislature and the Commonwealth. It serves no public interest to focus more time and attention on this issue when there are under-served and under-performing schools, an infrastructure showing signs of sustained neglect, gun and gang violence on the rise, jobs and people leaving the state, a growing homeless population, soaring health care costs, a looming deficit and a score of other serious challenges crying out for the attention and the creativity of the government and the people. We cannot in good conscience ask these unmet needs to wait while a few individuals try to insert discrimination into our Constitution.
And more recently, the Associated Press reports:
...on Saturday [Patrick, who] became the first sitting governor to march in Boston's gay pride parade, has warned of ``great passions and great fear and great intolerance'' among supporters of the amendment.
``All the (court) did was affirm an old principle that people come before their government as equals, that if the government is going to give marriage licenses to anyone, then they must give them to everybody, even if your choice of spouse is someone of the same gender,'' Patrick said.
A very few people hold in their hands an historic opportunity -- to end, perhaps forever, the division and hatred over this issue here in Massachusetts. Elected leaders so rarely get an opportunity such as this -- to ebody the tradition of John F. Kennedy's classic, Profiles in Courage -- and to decide to be on the right side of history when it matters most.
Only a handful of votes will decide whether Massachusetts goes the way of another season of hateful division led by the religious right.
|
|