Forthcoming Flick has Religious Right Leader Worried
According to The Hollywood Reporter: The 2 1/2-hour feature takes a stark look at all sides of the abortion debate, including footage of procedures, the killings of doctors who have performed them and interviews with such people as Operation Rescue founder Randall Terry and lawyer Alan Dershowitz. Made for more than $6 million over about 16 years, "Fire" will be released theatrically in October, with a possible three- to four-hour TV version to follow. But Ertelt says it "could wind up being known more for its graphic and sensationalist nature than its honest treatment of the abortion issue." A few sentences later he repeats himself. "The feature firm is said to take a look at both sides of the abortion debate but the movie may do more to sensationalize both sides. In fact, most reviewers so far have said that there is plenty in it to give both sides pause, and that the film is exceptionally even handed for such a volatile subject. But the film explores the dirty not-so-secret of the pro-life movement: how domestic terrorism has been integral to the movement for decades. The part of the face of the movement we rarely see includes interviews with the notorious Paul Hill, who committed a double murder of a doctor and his escort; as well as Michael Griffin, who also murdered a doctor. I wrote in more detail about the film back in January, and the film has since premeired at the Santa Barbara Film Festival.
But beyond rave reviews, I think the film will be politically important. I think it will inform and shape -- and perhaps transform -- public conversation about the politics of abortion for years to come, as any work of such force and distributed on a wide scale can do. In exactly what ways it will change the discourse on abortion, I cannot predict. But the coming of the film is nevertheless worth noting as we enter the election season. Those pols and the consultantocracy who believe they will no longer have to talk about abortion, may find themselves quite mistaken. Mark Urman of ThinkFilm, according to the Hollywood Reporter, plans to roll out "Fire" at more than a half-dozen film festivals before its release. "I'd like it to be followed by panels and argued in university settings, with government officials and with various clergy," he said. "Too many documentaries are rightly accused of preaching to the choir. This film is guaranteed to give you pause whether you're pro-choice or right-to-life." Indeed. There's the rub. Kaye's film forces us to contend with the domestic terrorism that has marked the antiabortion movement for a generation. I have not yet seen the film (I am interviewed in it) but I am certain from what I know of the interviewees, that there is much in this film that the antiabortion movement would rather we not see or think about. Here is one example: In 1998, Intelligence Report, the magazine of the Southern Poverty Law Center, interviewed Emily Lyons, a nurse severely wounded when a pipe bomb packed with nails explosed outside the clinic where she worked. Lyons is also interviewed in Lake of Fire.
On Jan. 29, a nail-packed bomb exploded outside the New Woman All Women Health Care Center in Birmingham, Ala., killing off-duty police officer Robert "Sande" Sanderson and maiming nurse Emily Lyons. (Since then, Rudolph has been captured, tried and convicted. He is also known to have pipe-bombed the 1996 Atlanta Olympics, another clinic and a gay bar.) Read the interview to get a sense of why people like Ertelt are -- and should be -- worried.
Forthcoming Flick has Religious Right Leader Worried | 6 comments (6 topical, 0 hidden)
Forthcoming Flick has Religious Right Leader Worried | 6 comments (6 topical, 0 hidden)
|
||||||||||||
|