Reconstructionists and the Tithe
In this context, it is not hard to understand why rural Americans find a resonance in the implications that Rushdoony draws from the biblical tithe:
The Bible provides, as the foundation law of a godly social order, the law of the tithe. To understand the full implication of the tithe, it is important to know that Biblical law has no property tax; the right to tax real property is implicitly denied to the state, because the state has no earth to tax. "The earth is the Lord's" (Ex. 9:29; Deut. 10:14; Ps. 24:1; 1 Cor. 10:26, etc.); therefore, only God can tax the earth. . . . For the state to enter into God's realm is to invite judgment. Rushdoony believes that paying biblical tithes is a perpetual obligation and that "Those who do not tithe are spiritual anarchists; they destroy both the freedom and order of society and unleash the demons of statism." p. 58 Rushdoony rues the days after the American revolution when the church was being separated from the state and laws requiring mandatory payment of tithes were being repealed:
The tithe was for centuries legally collected, i.e., the state provided the legal requirement that tithes be paid to the church. When Virginia repealed its law which made payment of the tithe mandatory, George Washington expressed his disapproval in a letter to George Mason, October 3, 1785. He believed, he said, in "making people pay toward the support of that which they profess." From the 4th century on, civil governments began to require the tithe, because it was believed that a country could only deny God His tax at its peril. From the end of the 18th century, and especially in recent years, such laws have disappeared under the impact of atheistic and revolutionary movements. Instead of freeing men from an "oppressive" tax, the abolition of the tithe has opened the way for truly oppressive taxation by the state in order to assume the social responsibilities once maintained by tithe money. Basic social functions must be paid for. If they are not paid by responsible, tithing Christian people, they will be paid for by a tyrant state which will use welfare and education as stepping-stones to totalitarian power. p. 57. Welfare and education are the foremost concerns that Rushdoony sees addressed by the biblical tithe and he sees a special class of people, "the group best instructed in the law of God," as those who should receive those funds:
The Lord's tithe, and the poor tithe, took care of the basic functions which, under the modern totalitarianism, have become the province of the state, namely, education and welfare. Education was one of the functions of the Levites (not of the sanctuary). . . . In a godly civil order, the group best instructed in the law of God will clearly have far-reaching social services to render. Since their support is undergirded by the tithe, the basic cost to society for civil government becomes slight. The tithe is an acknowledgement of God's kingship; in I Samuel 8:4-19, the consequences of a rejection of God's kingship are cited: they are totalitarianism, oppression, a loss of liberty, and an increased cost of civil government. Without the tithe, basic social functions fall into two kinds of pitfalls: on the one hand, the state assumes these functions, and, on the other, wealthy individuals and foundations exercise a preponderant power over society. Tithing releases society from this dependence on the state and on wealthy individuals and foundations. The tithe places the basic control of society with the tithing people of God. p. 55
This statement reveals a major thrust of Dominionism. They view funding for welfare and education as the mechanism by which to regain "basic control of society." They also realize that the language of "tithing" needs to be reframed for the American public. That's why their agenda has been framed as a "faith-based initiative" that ends "discrimination" against churches in the distribution of federal funds.
Reconstructionists and the Tithe | 4 comments (4 topical, 0 hidden)
Reconstructionists and the Tithe | 4 comments (4 topical, 0 hidden)
|
||||||||||||
|