Heavily dependent on the research and writings of Shadia Drury, Lobe describes a political philosophy that boils down to three basic principles:

1.  Deception is necessary to lead the masses.
   
2.  Religion is required to control the masses.
   
3.  Nations survive by uniting the masses against other people.

According to Drury, Strauss had a "huge contempt" for secular democracy. Nazism, he believed, was a nihilistic reaction to the irreligious and liberal nature of the Weimar Republic. Among other neoconservatives, Irving Kristol has long argued for a much greater role for religion in the public sphere, even suggesting that the Founding Fathers of the American Republic made a major mistake by insisting on the separation of church and state. And why? Because Strauss viewed religion as absolutely essential in order to impose moral law on the masses who otherwise would be out of control.

At the same time, he stressed that religion was for the masses alone; the rulers need not be bound by it. Indeed, it would be absurd if they were, since the truths proclaimed by religion were "a pious fraud." As Ronald Bailey, science correspondent for Reason magazine points out, "Neoconservatives are pro-religion even though they themselves may not be believers."

"Secular society in their view is the worst possible thing,'' Drury says, because it leads to individualism, liberalism, and relativism, precisely those traits that may promote dissent that in turn could dangerously weaken society's ability to cope with external threats. Bailey argues that it is this firm belief in the political utility of religion as an "opiate of the masses" that helps explain why secular Jews like Kristol in 'Commentary' magazine and other neoconservative journals have allied themselves with the Christian Right and even taken on Darwin's theory of evolution.

After reading Lobe's essay I began to read some of his sources.  I've read all of Shadia Drury's published works on Strauss.  In my opinion, she has produced a convincing corpus of research and analysis on Strauss' philosophy.

For the past couple years I have been observing Strauss' disciples in action.  Drury has proven to be the best guide that I've read for understanding the principles by which neo-conservatives in this administration are actually operating.  Those interpreting this administration by any other frame of reference keep letting their frame trump the facts.