The Role of the Pastor in an Attack: the Aggressor
In the church I wrote about last week, George Dohm served as the perfect example of an aggressor. That the church voted to disaffiliate with the United Church of Christ in November of 2003 can be tracked all the way back to his hiring. To be sure, there were warning signs and indications that George was preparing for just such a move. His first church was a new church start in the United Church of Christ which - though funded by UCC money - he refused to refer to in newsletters, ads, and signage as having anything to do with the United Church of Christ. The church closed not long after he left. His second church was just outside of the St. Louis metro area and shortly after his resignation from the church the church took a vote to leave the denomination. The vote failed by a narrow margin, but many of the disgruntled members left the church in anger. All of this is to say that George had a history when he went to Redeemer in South St. Louis. By the time I came into the judicatory office of the Missouri Mid-South Conference, George had resigned from the church but promised to return when his disciples there completed the takeover. His aggressive tactics began as far back as his first week on the job: the choir director I spoke with in May of 2003 revealed to me that in the first week George told him that he would have the church out of the UCC in a short while, and that he could "leave right now with over half of the members." I wrote last week about George continuing to meet with the leaders months after he left the church, and coming back to preach about the evils of the UCC in July of 2003. George is the prototypical aggressor. There are many such pastors serving churches all over the country. They have been trained to deploy tactics and maneuvers designed to divide and conquer congregations. George's mentor was none other than Mark Friz, formerly a pastor ordained to serve the United Church of Christ and recognized throughout the Mid-West as the one to call when you want to learn how and why to take out a church. Mark claims that he never calls a church to talk about a take-over, but that he could quit his current position as Pastor at St. Paul's Evangelical Free Church (formerly St. Paul United Church of Christ - they voted to leave the UCC a few years after Mark's arrival from the church in Wellington, MO which - to no one's surprise - also voted to leave the United Church of Christ) and spend the rest of his life speaking at churches that have asked him to come and talk about leaving the UCC. In a sermon offered the week before George Dohm preached his now infamous "Dog-crap" sermon (see last week's Anatomy of an Attack: Part 1), Mark spoke from the same pulpit and reiterated what has become his mantra: when you vote to disaffiliate, you do it not because you want to leave the UCC, you do it because you recognize that it has left you. Sheldon Culver and I were present this past November when Mark spoke at one of our churches in Jamestown, MO - a church in central Missouri that shares its pastor with another church not far away. In January, one of those two churches voted to disaffiliate, and the second one voted by a mere 4% to stay in the UCC. Knowing how crucial the role of an aggressive pastor can be, David Runnion-Bareford, the Executive Director of the Biblical Witness Fellowship (a `Renewal Group' of the UCC), works to maintain a listing of what he calls "Godly Pastors' in what is known as the "Pastoral Referral Network." This private list of clergy is kept secret from the wider church. Clergy are invited to fill out an application to enter the Network and be shopped around by whomever it is that executes these maneuvers (no one has admitted to it, though the address to which you send the applications happens to be the same address of the pastor of the UCC church in Candia, NH: one David Runnion-Bareford). Envelopes are sent to Search Committees with the names of candidates active in the Pastoral Referral Network without Conference Staff knowing about it, and without going through the standard criminal and ecclesial background checks that assure those same committees that the candidate has been cleared to serve a church. In a radio interview that aired on June 21, 2004 on KFUO in St. Louis on a program called "Issues, Etc.," David Runnion-Bareford was asked about the shortage of clergy in the UCC. He gave some statistics and some analysis, and then talked about the Pastoral Referral Network, and how he and others recruit from Evangelical seminaries those who are not affiliated with the United Church of Christ. (The entire interview can be heard at http://www.kfuo.org/ie_archive_juno4.html) Even though he has lost his standing and has been deemed unfit for ministry in and on behalf of the United Church of Christ, George Dohm is now being proposed as the likely successor to the outgoing pastor at our United Church of Christ in Marthasville, MO. As a tried and true aggressor, no one would doubt that this is an overt signal to the members that someone has targeted this church as a likely candidate for a takeover. I find myself aghast at what happens in and to these churches by pastors like the ones described here. I have no problem with those whose theology and biblical renderings lead them to draw different conclusions than the ones I do. But there are churches already happy to receive their ministry. To go into a church comfortable with its own history and affiliation with the clear intent of taking it out is unconscionable. What Mark Friz and George Dohm and their ilk will argue is that they never intend to take out a church, they are only present when the church wakes up to its true self and realizes that they are affiliated with a denomination that has abandoned the gospel. But someone needs to ask them why neither one has yet to serve a church that figured that out before they arrived. And someone needs to ask them how they feel about the millions of dollars in assets that come with a takeover like this, and how much of a role that plays in their decision to go to churches that are currently UCC and then remove them for the sake of another denomination, rather than choosing to serve a church that is already affiliated with that denomination? Pastor as Aggressor: beware. Well trained, theologically inclined, and ethically bankrupt these pastors are chosen for one purpose: disrupt, destabilize, and disaffiliate. Though referred to in their literature as `Godly Pastors,' one sees little of God in the effort.
The Role of the Pastor in an Attack: the Aggressor | 80 comments (80 topical, 0 hidden)
The Role of the Pastor in an Attack: the Aggressor | 80 comments (80 topical, 0 hidden)
|
||||||||||||
|