Understanding and confronting Christian hate speech
Lorie Johnson printable version print page     Bookmark and Share
Wed Jan 25, 2006 at 09:43:53 AM EST
Another of the goals of the Christian Coalition reads as follows:

Passing Congressman Walter Jones' "Houses of Worship Free Speech Restoration Act," H.R. 235. HR 235 was introduced to liberate clergy from the muzzle imposed by the absolute ban on all speech that may be regarded as "political," and thereby enable them to speak out on all vital and moral [emphasis mine] and political questions of the day. It will free houses of worship from the fear and anxiety and uncertainty created by the threat that the IRS will impose financial penalties or revoke tax-exempt status altogether.

This act is a double edged sword- it is meant to permit pastors to promote political candidates, but it is also meant to permit speech that, to many, may also provide further cover for religious leaders on the Christian right who engage in hate speech under the guise of 'moral questions'.

What are these 'moral questions'? When does religious morality become hate? Let's examine the religious right's escalation of intolerance towards gay rights, and see how this leads to overt hate. In her post below, Joan Bokaer talks about a service at the Airport Church in Toronto turning into a political rally to to urge members of the Canadian parliament to vote against an 'unbiblical' gay marriage amendment.

If there is one thing that rallies the extreme right and conservative Christians, it is the advancement of human rights for gay, lesbian, bi- and trans-sexual people. While the bible only mentions men, modern belivers expand that to encompass all non-hetrosexual acts and orientations.

(For a deeper explanation of Lev. 18:22, go here.)

For religious absolutists, this verse is divine permission to condemn, persecute, and hate and even kill those who engage in the forbidden act. The irony is that many other things that are also considered an 'abomination' to God, like shaving, tolerating disobedient children, wearing clothing of mixed fibers, eating cheeseburgers, shellfish or pork, are not forbidden by these absolutists, but the Biblical penalty is the same.  

The fear of an expanding mythological 'gay agenda' has caused many conservative pastors and churches to say and do many things that express overt intolerance and hatred toward those they see as offenders. The American Family Association has again boycotted Ford because they are advertising to gay people, and a Seattle area preacher has told his flock to buy and dump Microsoft stock to protest the company's endorsing a gay rights bill in that state.

The most overt example of hate speech is Fred Phelps and his Westboro Baptist Church who go to funerals of gayand military people and parade hateful signs around.

While little has been done in the US to counter overt religious hate speech, other countries have noticed this trend in their midst and have taken action to put an end to it.  In Canada, a bill C-250 was passed banning hate speech in 2004. In Sweden, Australia, South Africa, and the UK, laws have been passed to criminalize hate speech of not only Christians, but of any faith that invokes hate and intolerance. In the UK, this law was aimed at Islamic hate speech, but in Australia, the laws there were meant to quell anti-Islamic hate speech from conservative Christian churches.

In the US, individual states are taking up the matter of hate speech, and individual companies are standing up to those who promote intolerance, and the SPLC     Intelligence Report last spring highlighted the anti-gay push of many conservative groups.

Do you have to hate certain people and things to be a real Christian? To some, you must. For the rest of us, it is a virulent toxin that must be isolated from the greater culture. In order for our culture to survive and thrive, people need to have basic rights- no matter what their sexual orientation might be. Christ taught us to love our neighbors, not hate them. We must remember that.




Display:
Here is the website that talks about HR 235.

by Lorie Johnson on Wed Jan 25, 2006 at 11:11:21 AM EST

There is no doubt that a lot of the anti-gay speech in evangelical churches is sympathetic with and lends itself to the purveyors of hate.

Some of the preaching, however, is just trying to be faithful to a literal interpretation of the Bible in regards to homosexuality.

Discussions about the adequacy of different biblical interpretations need to be conducted in ways that are not polarized by hot-button issues.

There are times when gay activists in Oklahoma have pressed this issue in counterproductive ways.

One group led a protest outside a local Baptist church trying to get the pastor to stop preaching that homosexuality was sin.  Then the pastor had a legitimate claim that his civil right to free speech was being challenged.

Within houses of worship, everyone has a right to freely speak about their own religious convictions.  

When the speaking changes in houses of worship from religious convictions to political endorsements and electioneering, they are still free to express their opinions -- as long as they agree to abide by the same rules as other political groups -- which means they need to relinquish the tax exemption for their contributions.  No other political organizations are not allowed tax exemptions for contributions to express their opinions and organize politically.

Those who cannot separate their religious convictions and worship from their political organizing and opinions are demonstrating that they are theocrats.

by Mainstream Baptist on Wed Jan 25, 2006 at 12:40:15 PM EST

When the speaking changes in houses of worship from religious convictions to political endorsements and electioneering, they are still free to express their opinions -- as long as they agree to abide by the same rules as other political groups -- which means they need to relinquish the tax exemption for their contributions.

I agree with you wholeheartedly. If they insist on propogating their political beliefs 'outside'- thus breaking the rules, they should no longer be protected by the tax-exempt status.

Same thing with their religious convictions- inside the church is one thing- but to make it the law of the land is quite another.

It is one thing to believe that homosexuality is a sin. It is entirely another to prosecute an entire class of people using civil law to enforce this belief. That is where the line should be drawn.

The irony here is that it appears to me that laws are given and enforced in only one direction in theocratic circles- onlytheir laws count. And if it isn't their law, they feel that they can break it on religious grounds- including rousing the masses of believers to create or repeal laws they do not like.

by Lorie Johnson on Wed Jan 25, 2006 at 12:59:21 PM EST
Parent

You said:

The irony here is that it appears to me that laws are given and enforced in only one direction in theocratic circles -- only their laws count.

I agree.  It is paralleled by the way they understand church/state separation -- given and enforced in only one direction.  To them, separation of church and state, only keeps the state from meddling in the affairs of the church. It does not keep the church from meddling in the affairs of the state.

by Mainstream Baptist on Wed Jan 25, 2006 at 01:12:34 PM EST
Parent

I did an in-depth study of the Establishment Clause so I could understand the mechanics of this unique clause. I immediately noted that it was a two-way street- that the church could not play in government, nor could the government endorse a church or faith. It was an amazing check/balance that was carefully crafted, and fiercely debated by the Framers.

But to talk to some of the more fiercely theocratic Christians, it really is a one-way street. They can meddle in government all they want, but if the government calls them on it, or puts a halt to their activities, they holler "Persecution!"

Sigh...

I've tried the tack of asking some of these folks the classic 'what if' question: what if the government promoted a faith that was anathema to their own, or a faith that was anathema to theirs became heavily influential in government? How would they react? Is it only OK if it's their particular faith?

I've never gotten an answer to that question.

by Lorie Johnson on Wed Jan 25, 2006 at 01:22:06 PM EST
Parent

They have an answer, they just won't give voice to it publicly.

Their answer is to covertly work to have the courts or the legislature declare their faith ("Biblical" Christianity) the nation's established religion -- for all time and history.

by Mainstream Baptist on Wed Jan 25, 2006 at 03:53:45 PM EST
Parent





The sentence:

No other political organizations are not allowed tax exemptions for contributions to express their opinions and organize politically.

Should read:

No other political organizations are allowed tax exemptions for contributions to express their opinions and organize politically.


by Mainstream Baptist on Wed Jan 25, 2006 at 12:43:52 PM EST
Parent


Or is it just the right to participate in the civil debate?

<< Those who cannot separate their religious convictions and worship from their political organizing and opinions are demonstrating that they are theocrats. >>

In the VIRGINIA STATUTE FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM Thomas Jefferson wrote:

"...our civil rights have no dependence on our religious opinions, any more than our opinions in physics or geometry...that truth is great and will prevail if left to herself, that she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict, unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons, free argument and debate, errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is permitted freely to contradict them..."

Jefferson is saying that our civil rights are not dependant on either religious or scientific opinions. He is also saying that the truth will win out unless free argument and debate is restricted to only certain opinions.

So in light of what Jefferson wrote, why are "Those who cannot separate their religious convictions and worship from their political organizing and opinions" labeled as "theocrats." (ones who rule or favor a theocratic form of government (a state governed by God or by religious officials)), and not just participants in the civil arena with opinions just as equal as all other opinions?


by Vaclav on Wed Jan 25, 2006 at 09:08:36 PM EST
Parent



The provided link to the various interpretations and translations of the Leviticus passage on man-on-man sex was VERY informative (reminds me of a Hebrew study of the 10 Commandments, including the one about "no other God but me", which in fact does not say that there are no other Gods, only that - for the Jews - this one is the only god for THEM). Also a very good point about church/state separation being a 2 WAY STREET, not just protecting churches from government. I feel that more time needs to be spent discussing what an imperfect document the Bible really is (since it was written, copied, edited and traslated by imperfect men). Citing further Leviticus abominations EQUAL to lying with a man - including all-American cheesburgeres, mixed fabrics and footballs (no touching the skin of a pig) to loosen the "inerrrant" argument is an important strategy in attempting to insert some rationality into the debate.

by joelp on Wed Jan 25, 2006 at 01:45:46 PM EST


WWW Talk To Action


Cognitive Dissonance & Dominionism Denial
There is new research on why people are averse to hearing or learning about the views of ideological opponents. Based on evaluation of five......
By Frederick Clarkson (375 comments)
Will the Air Force Do Anything To Rein In Its Dynamic Duo of Gay-Bashing, Misogynistic Bloggers?
"I always get nervous when I see female pastors/chaplains. Here is why everyone should as well: "First, women are not called to be pastors,......
By Chris Rodda (203 comments)
The Legacy of Big Oil
The media is ablaze with the upcoming publication of David Grann's book, Killers of the Flower Moon. The shocking non fiction account of the......
By wilkyjr (111 comments)
Gimme That Old Time Dominionism Denial
Over the years, I have written a great deal here and in other venues about the explicitly theocratic movement called dominionism -- which has......
By Frederick Clarkson (101 comments)
History Advisor to Members of Congress Completely Twists Jefferson's Words to Support Muslim Ban
Pseudo-historian David Barton, best known for his misquoting of our country's founders to promote the notion that America was founded as a Christian nation,......
By Chris Rodda (113 comments)
"Christian Fighter Pilot" Calls First Lesbian Air Force Academy Commandant a Liar
In a new post on his "Christian Fighter Pilot" blog titled "BGen Kristin Goodwin and the USAFA Honor Code," Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan......
By Chris Rodda (144 comments)
Catholic Right Leader Unapologetic about Call for 'Death to Liberal Professors' -- UPDATED
Today, Donald Trump appointed C-FAM Executive Vice President Lisa Correnti to the US Delegation To UN Commission On Status Of Women. (C-FAM is a......
By Frederick Clarkson (126 comments)
Controlling Information
     Yesterday I listened to Russ Limbaugh.  Rush advised listeners it would be best that they not listen to CNN,MSNBC, ABC, CBS and......
By wilkyjr (118 comments)
Is Bannon Fifth-Columning the Pope?
In December 2016 I wrote about how White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, who likes to flash his Catholic credentials when it comes to......
By Frank Cocozzelli (251 comments)
Ross Douthat's Hackery on the Seemingly Incongruous Alliance of Bannon & Burke
Conservative Catholic writer Ross Douthat has dissembled again. This time, in a February 15, 2017 New York Times op-ed titled The Trump Era's Catholic......
By Frank Cocozzelli (65 comments)
`So-Called Patriots' Attack The Rule Of Law
Every so often, right-wing commentator Pat Buchanan lurches out of the far-right fever swamp where he has resided for the past 50 years to......
By Rob Boston (161 comments)
Bad Faith from Focus on the Family
Here is one from the archives, Feb 12, 2011, that serves as a reminder of how deeply disingenuous people can be. Appeals to seek......
By Frederick Clarkson (177 comments)
The Legacy of George Wallace
"One need not accept any of those views to agree that they had appealed to real concerns of real people, not to mindless, unreasoning......
By wilkyjr (70 comments)
Betsy DeVos's Mudsill View of Public Education
My Talk to Action colleague Rachel Tabachnick has been doing yeoman's work in explaining Betsy DeVos's long-term strategy for decimating universal public education. If......
By Frank Cocozzelli (80 comments)
Prince and DeVos Families at Intersection of Radical Free Market Privatizers and Religious Right
This post from 2011 surfaces important information about President-Elect Trump's nominee for Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos. -- FC Erik Prince, Brother of Betsy......
By Rachel Tabachnick (218 comments)

Respect for Others? or Political Correctness?
The term "political correctness" as used by Conservatives and Republicans has often puzzled me: what exactly do they mean by it? After reading Chip Berlin's piece here-- http://www.talk2action.org/story/2016/7/21/04356/9417 I thought about what he explained......
MTOLincoln (253 comments)
Fear
What I'm feeling now is fear.  I swear that it seems my nightmares are coming true with this new "president".  I'm also frustrated because so many people are not connecting all the dots! I've......
ArchaeoBob (107 comments)
"America - love it or LEAVE!"
I've been hearing that and similar sentiments fairly frequently in the last few days - far FAR more often than ever before.  Hearing about "consequences for burning the flag (actions) from Trump is chilling!......
ArchaeoBob (214 comments)
"Faked!" Meme
Keep your eyes and ears open for a possible move to try to discredit the people openly opposing Trump and the bigots, especially people who have experienced terrorism from the "Right"  (Christian Terrorism is......
ArchaeoBob (165 comments)
More aggressive proselytizing
My wife told me today of an experience she had this last week, where she was proselytized by a McDonald's employee while in the store. ......
ArchaeoBob (163 comments)
See if you recognize names on this list
This comes from the local newspaper, which was conservative before and took a hard right turn after it was sold. Hint: Sarah Palin's name is on it!  (It's also connected to Trump.) ......
ArchaeoBob (169 comments)
Unions: A Labor Day Discussion
This is a revision of an article which I posted on my personal board and also on Dailykos. I had an interesting discussion on a discussion board concerning Unions. I tried to piece it......
Xulon (180 comments)
Extremely obnoxious protesters at WitchsFest NYC: connected to NAR?
In July of this year, some extremely loud, obnoxious Christian-identified protesters showed up at WitchsFest, an annual Pagan street fair here in NYC.  Here's an account of the protest by Pagan writer Heather Greene......
Diane Vera (130 comments)
Capitalism and the Attack on the Imago Dei
I joined this site today, having been linked here by Crooksandliars' Blog Roundup. I thought I'd put up something I put up previously on my Wordpress blog and also at the DailyKos. As will......
Xulon (331 comments)
History of attitudes towards poverty and the churches.
Jesus is said to have stated that "The Poor will always be with you" and some Christians have used that to refuse to try to help the poor, because "they will always be with......
ArchaeoBob (149 comments)
Alternate economy medical treatment
Dogemperor wrote several times about the alternate economy structure that dominionists have built.  Well, it's actually made the news.  Pretty good article, although it doesn't get into how bad people could be (have been)......
ArchaeoBob (90 comments)
Evidence violence is more common than believed
Think I've been making things up about experiencing Christian Terrorism or exaggerating, or that it was an isolated incident?  I suggest you read this article (linked below in body), which is about our great......
ArchaeoBob (214 comments)

More Diaries...




All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors. Everything else © 2005 Talk to Action, LLC.