During the summer of 2013 I wrote several posts about Catholic Neo-Confederates. My purpose was to explain the activities of libertarians such as Tom Woods, Thomas DiLorenzo and an organization known as the League of the South: all of whom advocate for the secession and nullification as tools to be used by the Christian Right.

To that end, they perpetuate the myth of an antebellum South that was united in its belief in and desire for secession. They paint a portrait of Old Dixie as both an orthodox Christian and libertarian paradise for all its inhabitants that was spoiled by a foreign intruder:  thus their claim that the conflict of 1861 to 1865 was not a Civil War initiated by a faction of Southern planters -- but a war of Northern aggression.

Bullfeathers and balderdash!

A self-appointed expert on sex and relationships won't speak at an El Paso, Texas, high school - for now.

Jason Evert runs an outfit called Chastity Project. He is yet another in a seemingly endless parade of speakers who somehow manage to get themselves invited to public schools even though what they have to offer is thin at best and sometimes offensive.

Silent movie, Birth of a Nation, became the first blockbuster screen phenomena.  Civil Rights groups deplored the production and sought to ban it.  It was a glamourous portrayal of the   Klan and promoted the idea that the primary motivation of black freed slaves was to seduce or rape white women.  A Baptist minister wrote the story that became the epic media event early last century.  Media events were proven to have a huge impact regardless of the historical or factual accuracy.

The recent dust-up over the meeting between Pope Francis and culture warrior Kim Davis has caused the Pontiff's stock to fall somewhat among liberals. Many of us felt let down by the pope's opposition to marriage equality after his uplifting talk and formal declarations about confronting the causes of both global warming and economic inequality.

But with that said, it is for wiser to look at the Pope's actions as opposed to individual statements. And for that reason he has put the Catholic Church on the trajectory for positive change.

My inbox this morning contained a press release from the American Family Association (AFA). The Tupelo, Miss.-based Religious Right group has exciting news: It has decided to launch a new tool to rate companies based on how they deal with "religious liberty."

It's called the Corporate Religious Liberty Index (CRLI), and it will be compiled based on a short questionnaire (just seven questions) that "seeks to gauge the importance of religious liberty for the nation's major companies." The index, the AFA reports, is being compiled "in direct response to the growing threats against religious liberty in the U.S."

Surfing through old videos on youtube I found some interesting tapes of H. L. Hunt.  Certainly one of the original founders of the modern Religious Right in America.  Hunt supported McCarthy and once tried to bribe Billy Graham to run for President.  Hunt wrote a novel along with hundreds of columns in his magazines he owned and operated.  Hunt seldom attended public school and tended to see education as a device that hampered individual achievement.  His famous novel was called, Alpaca.  The book explained Hunt's view of the perfect society.  It was one where dictatorships were destroyed and the democracy had a peculiar spin.  The spin was that successful and wealthy men were allowed to have more votes than the average person.  

It has become a cliché to say that you spotted an article online that was so strange you first assumed it was from The Onion.

Yet that happened to me over the weekend. Several people posted a story to social media from Blount County, Tenn., concerning a resolution introduced by Karen Miller, a member of the county commission, that implores God to spare the county when he unleashes his wrath on the nation for permitting marriage equality.

An international network of some of the world’s most vitriolic Religious Right activists and self-proclaimed orthodox religious leaders is holding its ninth global conference in Salt Lake City, Utah this month. The World Congress of Families' (WCF) conferences tend to attract thousands of participants and prominent religious and political leaders from all over the world.

If past conferences are any indication, many Americans may be shocked, but not entirely surprised, by the proceedings.

“From Russia to Nigeria to Australia,” as my colleague at Political Research Associates Cole Parke explained regarding the WCF IX agenda, “a seemingly innocuous definition of the ‘natural family’ is quietly being used as the basis of new laws to justify the criminalization of abortion and LGBTQ people.”

Indeed. It has unleashed a rolling thunder of horrific anti-LGBTQ political activism, legislation, and violence. Unsurprisingly, the theme of the Salt Lake City conclave will be religious liberty, and the groups involved in the planning of the event are among the best known organizations of the American Christian Right. They include the Alliance Defending Freedom, Focus on the Family, Family Research Council, Americans United for Life, National Organization for Marriage, Eagle Forum, and the Manhattan Declaration.

Among the featured speakers will be Austin Ruse, the conservative Catholic pro-family leader who last year suggested violence against college faculty and administrators in response to a College Republican's libertarian views on sex, pornography, and women's studies.

Below is a revised and updated version of my story on the sordid episode.

When I was kid, the phrase "Banned in Boston" confused me. I thought of Boston as a liberal, cosmopolitan city. Surely they didn't censor things there.

They don't anymore, but they sure used to. About 100 years ago, Boston was in the grip of dour "vice" crusaders who used their religious beliefs to decide what books and magazines people could read and what performances they could see on stage. And it wasn't alone.

Catholic League president Bill Donohue goes after anyone he believes is engaging in anti-Catholic behavior, real or imagined. But as we have come to see, Donohue's criteria for response depends less on the content of a statement as who makes it.  And if the anti-Catholicism emanates from a religious libertarian conservative such as Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano, mum's the word. Donohue has frequently demonstrated this double standard since the ascendancy of Pope Francis.

What I did not realize was just how much more brutally ugly these comments would become - while at the same time the self-proclaimed Guardian of all things Catholic looks the other way.

The annual Values Voter Summit (VVS), the nation's largest gathering of the Religious Right, begins today. The event, sponsored by the Family Research Council (FRC), the American Family Association (AFA) and other far-right groups, is celebrating its 10-year anniversary. In light of that, I thought it might be interesting to look back at some of the highlights (or lowlights, if you will) of this event.

Here we go:

Much has been and will be written about the Pope regarding his historic visit to the U.S.  But it will be important to try to filter the hype from the historic as a man who is cast as a humble priest and a breath of fresh air, is simultaneously cast as a great leader striding across a global stage and treated as a celebrity.

My friend Frank Cocozzelli has been writing about how Pope Francis has been driving Catholic neoconservatives and the wider Religious Right and a large swath of the Republican Party quite crazy since his tenure began.  These are among the many indications that Francis may be able to right a badly listing institution.  But it is also worth considering that from the earliest days, the much ballyhooed "Francis effect" has been mostly ephemera --and that a number of writers caution that as much as Francis may challenge the culture warriors of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, it is wrong to expect that Francis will be a liberal reformer.